Father de Souza gets it right

I have found it difficult to comment on the news about the sexual abuse perpetrated by some of my brothers in the priesthood.  The hurt and damage done to the youthful victims is horrible in itself.   As a priest, I am ashamed that these crimes were done by, not only by fellow Christians, but especially those whom I regarded as brothers labouring in the same ministry as myself. 

I think the only way to remedy this tragic situation is to let the news come out, so that there will be no more the possibility of retreat back into a culture of silence.  Those responsible for the abuse  and for the inaction to put a stop to it should be made accountable.  In his column of March 25, 2010 National Post, Fr. de imageSouza puts the current scandal into a wider context.  He states:

The sexual abuse scandals are a result of the Church’s infidelity to her own identity and mission.

This infidelity was not only in the instance of dealing with sexual abusers, but also in other areas of church discipline from the 1960’s to 1980’s. 

Doctrinal dissent was not corrected, but often celebrated. Liturgical abuses, both minor and outrageously sacrilegious, were tolerated. Bishops simply stopped inquiring into priestly asceticism, prayer and holiness of life. Non-Catholics often have an image of the Catholic Church as a ruthlessly efficient organization with a chain of command that would make the armed forces jealous. The reality for most of the 1960s to 1980s was the opposite. A priest could preach heresy, profane the Holy Mass, destroy the piety of his people and face no consequences. The overseers decided to overlook everything. It is any surprise, then, that when accusations of criminal immorality emerged they too were dealt with inadequately, if at all?

As a youth and young adult during that period, I was a aware of the doctrinal dissent and liturgical abuses and wondered why steps were not taken to bring things bacimagek in line with the Church’s teaching and practise.  As I learned more and more about the Church’s tradition and heritage, I was saddened that I was not able to experience more of these things in my own parish.  For instance, when I  discovered Gregorian chant and the Church’s sacred music in my last years of high school, I wondered why none of this was being used in the local churches.  My parents made sure that we had a musical formation and so I began studying the piano at the age of seven.  Even in my teens I could see that most of the music we had at  church  was banal.  As far as quality was concerned, the pieces I studied in my weekly piano lessons were more worthy of the house of God than what we usually sang at Mass. (Of course, I am not advocating using those piano pieces at Mass.)

Fr. de Souza’s article is well worth the read.  In the Church we need to change from a culture of laxity to a culture of fidelity and integrity on the theological, liturgical, and moral level.  Bishops are entrusted with the authority to protect and guide the sheep.  Our Holy Father Pope Benedict is leading the way, as Fr. de Souza points out.  Now stop looking at this and read Fr. de Souza’s column "Culture change in the Church"!

Advertisements

About Didobonaparte

A Roman Catholic priest of the Archdiocese of Vancouver, I am the parish priest of Saint Joseph's Catholic Church, Langley.
This entry was posted in Gregorian Chant, sacred music and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Father de Souza gets it right

  1. Sash says:

    Excellent article by Fr. de Souza. Of course, your comments on the Liturgy are always insiteful.

    Pax

  2. Darren says:

    Thanks for sharing the article, Father. Yes, becoming more Catholic is the answer.

    When the traditions that have nourished and protected the Church’s faith are dropped, the seamless garment is torn and neither survive. And while many in the Church accuse “traditionalists” (often rightly) of a scrupulous legalism, the loss of liturgical and extra-liturgical traditions (I’m thinking especially of basic asceticism and use of sacramentals) has resulted in a minimalist legalism where, unless Canon Law requires it, “we don’t have to”. And now most of us — bishops, priests, and laity alike (myself included) — lack the spiritual muscles to turn to our Lord when faced with temptations or to seize opportunities for acts of charity. But, there’s hope for us all.

    Peace.

    • I think the attitude of laxity, either leads to, or goes hand in hand with taking for granted the actual graces and helps that God gives us though the Church and the heritage that she hands on to us. It’s easy to appreciate the good things of our Catholic heritage, but it is quite another thing to incorporate them into our daily lives. It reminds me of a music professor I had, who studied much in manuscripts of Gregorian chant and appreciated it, but had no interest in singing it, or cared whether anyone would actually use it in worship.

  3. Darren says:

    I should add that I’m a rookie at all of these traditional practices myself, having just dipped my toe in these practices over the past year and a bit. But it feels like the Church just got a whole lot bigger and brighter. So, if my comments above come across as a touch over-pious and over-zealous, consider it naive enthusiasm and nothing more.

Feel free to comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s